Certified Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Professional (CCP) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Enhance your understanding for the CMMC Professional Test. Engage with flashcards and multiple choice questions, complete with hints and explanations. Elevate your cybersecurity knowledge and prepare diligently for your certification exam.

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


Which assessment objective determines if designated locations for malicious code protection are identified?

  1. SC.L1-3.13.5

  2. SI.L1-3.14.2

  3. SI.L1-3.14.4

  4. SI.L1-3.14.5

The correct answer is: SI.L1-3.14.2

The assessment objective that determines if designated locations for malicious code protection are identified is focused on understanding how an organization addresses the risks associated with malicious software. This falls under the system and communications protection (SC) consideration and specifically evaluates how well an organization has established control measures to safeguard against malicious code. The correct choice emphasizes the necessity for an organization to not only deploy protective measures but also to ensure that these measures are strategically placed in identified locations where they can be most effective. This means mapping out areas within the network or system infrastructure that are high-risk for malicious code infiltration, such as entry points for data or systems that interact with external networks. In the broader context of cybersecurity maturity, this objective is crucial because it ensures that protective measures are intentional and well-planned, ultimately strengthening the organization's overall security posture. Identifying designated locations is a proactive approach that aligns with the best practices within the CMMC framework, which encourages organizations to not only react to threats but to anticipate and mitigate them effectively. The other choices do not directly focus on the identification of specific locations for malicious code protection but rather on different aspects of incident response and system monitoring related to malicious code and its implications.